Reviewing Process

All formal submissions are accepted. However, the reviewing process ensures that everyone's work receives early feedback, has a few attendees familiar with the work who can begin discussions during the workshop, and allows us to make a logical presentation schedule.

Everyone who makes a submission has, by default, agreed to act as a reviewer.

After you send in your submission:

•	We will send you two (2) submissions to review
•	Each of these submissions will arrive in a seperate e-mail, containing the submission and a blank text-only review form similar to the ones used for SIGGRAPH
•	Respond to these questions as carefully, generously, and helpfully as you can. Give very specific suggestions on ways to improve the idea, the writing, the figures, the organization, etc. Describe how you might modify this paper to make it irresistible to reviewers. (Note: Your reviews will remain anonymous.)
•	Promptly return your reviews via e-mail, so we can forward them to the authors to help them revise their paper and prepare their presentation.
•	At the workshop, bring at least one good thought-provoking discussion question for each of the two submissions you reviewed. This should encourage lively and helpful discussions.

Bare in mind that although the idea of the workshop is to get some early feedback for SIGGRAPH papers, the submissions do not need to be targeted to SIGGRAPH at all -- any paper in progress is fine.

We look forward to your submissions and reviews!